The ACLU and the Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law wrote to the Florida Secretary of State today to inform the state that the ongoing effort to remove legal, registered voters from the voting rolls is "in violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993..."

The letter is here. http://www.aclufl.org/pdfs/2012-06-FloridaNVRANoticeLetter.pdf

Florida's effort to kick people off its voter registration rolls has ensared hundreds of citizens who are legally eligible to vote.

Yesterday, the United States Departement of Justice wrote to Florida similarly expressing concerns about the voter purge. The DOJ letter is here. http://www.postonpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/0531-DOJPURGELETTER.pdf

Date

Friday, June 1, 2012 - 4:18pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Racial Justice Voting Rights

Show related content

Author:
admin

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

Yesterday a federal court in Tallahassee blocked enforcement of a key portion of Florida’s new voting laws – the section which placed new restrictions and financial penalties on civic groups which undertook voter registration drives.

The new law was so bad that groups such as The League of Women Voters stopped registering voters entirely and two teachers were threatened with fines for registering students in their classrooms under the guise of cracking down on ‘voter fraud.’



The ACLU was part of the legal team representing The League of Women Voters, Rock the Vote and other impacted groups in Constitutional challenge to the law. We argued, in part, that restricting the rights of individuals and organizations to engage in the political process without a compelling state interest was a violation of First Amendment. The judge agreed.

In the ruling the Judge wrote, “The short deadline, coupled with substantial penalties for noncompliance, make voter registration drives a risky business.  If the goal is to discourage voter registration drives and thus make it harder for new voters to register, the 48-hour deadline may succeed.”

Clearly, as we argued from the very considering on this law in the Legislature, the goal was to make it harder for people to register to vote. And limited those opportunities has a real impact on the people who do voter registration as well as the voters and communities they engage.

Other parts of the law made it harder to vote and harder to have your vote counted. Those provisions are also under review in another case where ACLU is part of the legal team. This one is before a federal court in the District of Columbia and will determine whether the changes are legal under the U.S. Voting Rights Act because of their disproportionate impact on racial and language minorities.

Those changes and Florida’s recent and deeply flawed efforts to remove legally registered voters from the voting roles are part of a pattern in Florida to make voting harder and more complicated.

But the decision yesterday was a significant step in re-establishing the rule of law of the weight of constitutional protections in Florida’s election procedures. As the judge also wrote yesterday, “Soliciting an application [to register to vote] is core First Amendment speech.”

Yes, it is.

Date

Friday, June 1, 2012 - 2:58pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Free Speech Voting Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

I’m a lawyer, not a literary critic. I can’t predict whether E.L. James’ “Fifty Shades of Grey” trilogy has literary merit or is just a blip on the radar screen of popular culture.  Have I read the books?  Sure.  Research is central to a lawyer’s work.  Do I care who’ll play Anastasia Steele or Christian Grey in the film version of the trilogy?  Nope.

But I care about the First Amendment, and I know censorship when I see it.  When the Brevard public library removed from circulation nineteen copies of Fifty Shades of Grey, based on one individual’s misguided sense of decorum, a resounding chorus of “Really?” was heard across the country:  in 2012, would a public library, an arm of the government, really strip a book from its collection on the ground that it was “semi-pornographic”?  Mind you, this is a public library that carries the Zane chronicles, including Gettin’ Buck Wild:  Sex Chronicles II (Zane Does Incredible, Erotic Things). Really.

In Brevard County, “Really?” became “Hell, no,” as men and women, card-carrying members of the Brevard County Library System demanded that the books be returned to the shelves.  On May 24, the ACLU of Florida and the National Coalition Against Censorship sent a letter to the Brevard County Commissioners, reminding them that the County’s removal of “Fifty Shades of Grey” from circulation violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Section 4 of the Florida Constitution and exposed the County Commission to potential liability.

Yesterday, on May 28, the County’s Communications Director announced that “The Brevard County Library System will return ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ to its library shelves.”  The Library Services Director, who had made the initial decision to scrap the books, remarked “We have always stood against censorship.”  Really.

But all’s well that ends well:  score one for the First Amendment.  “Laters, baby.”

Date

Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - 4:53pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Free Speech

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Florida RSS