Privacy

Privacy

The word “privacy” means many different things to different people. One widely accepted meaning, however, is “the right to left alone,” as it was described by former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in the Harvard Law Review of 1890. This cherished right is now under attack, and the primary culprits range from law enforcement agencies using surveillance systems, to government programs that collect and distribute your personal data, to public and private sector employers who are using the power of the paycheck to tell their employees what they can and cannot do in the privacy of their own homes.

From intrusive police surveillance technology to cell phone and email tracking programs to intrusive and unconstitutional drug testing policies that treat entire groups of Floridians like suspected criminals, governments are spying on us in ways the founders of our country could never have imagined. The ACLU of Florida works to make the public aware of the ways their personal data is being used and protect their right to privacy from government overreach.

The Latest

News & Commentary
Placeholder image

Your Questions Answered: Trump’s First 100 Days

Can Trump change the law with an executive order? Erase DEI at the federal level? Target dissent? ACLU experts answer.
News & Commentary
Placeholder image

Medicaid Work Requirements Don’t Work — They Harm People with Disabilities

We’ve been here before. Work requirements only cut care, nothing else.
News & Commentary
Placeholder image

Trump's Expanded Domestic Military Use Should Worry Us All

President Donald Trump's use of the military domestically is dangerous and deeply misguided.
News & Commentary
Placeholder image

Five State and Local Entities Safeguarding Our Civil Rights

Governors, attorneys general, mayors, and other local officials are starting to vocally say no to President Donald Trump’s radical and dangerous agenda. Here’s why their roles are so crucial for our democracy and the state of civil liberties today.
Court Case
June 11, 2026

Dillon v. City of Jacksonville Beach

In August 2024, Robert Dillon’s life was irreparably changed when police wrongfully arrested him for a crime he never committed in a city he had never been to. He was falsely accused of trying to lure a child at a fast-food restaurant in Jacksonville Beach, more than 300 miles away from his home, after police ran a grainy image of the suspect through an AI-assisted facial recognition program, which incorrectly identified him as a possible match. Mr. Dillon, a 52-year-old resident of Fort Myers, Florida, is suing the Jacksonville Beach Police Department, as well as the Jacksonville and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Offices and two individual officers, for his wrongful arrest. Police arrested Mr. Dillon after they relied on the incorrect facial recognition technology result, let that result taint a subsequent photo lineup, and then applied for an arrest warrant while concealing information showing that Mr. Dillon could not have committed the crime he was being accused of. Facial recognition technology is fundamentally unreliable, often misidentifying people. And as similar wrongful arrests across the country have shown, following a facial recognition technology search with a photographic lineup is a recipe for misidentifications—a false match usually looks similar to the suspect, misleading witnesses who are asked to choose between that innocent lookalike and a set of filler photos that necessarily look less like the suspect. In this case, police also omitted from the warrant application key facts, including that the suspect was a “regular” at the restaurant, yet Mr. Dillon lived five hours away and had told police he had never been to Jacksonville Beach in his life, and that an automatic license plate reader database search showed no hits on Mr. Dillon’s car anywhere near the restaurant. Mr. Dillon is represented by the ACLU, ACLU of Florida, and the law firm of Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, LLP. His lawsuit seeks both monetary damages and injunctive relief, in the form of policy changes to help prevent police from wrongfully arresting other people due to reliance on facial recognition technology.