New records obtained by the ACLU shed light on the scope of a mass surveillance program keeping tabs on Americans’ financial data.
Here are our guiding principles that communities and policymakers should follow when debating police robots.
The Federal Trade Commission should adopt binding rules to identify and prevent algorithmic discrimination.
We’re calling on the court to clarify that long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home is a Fourth Amendment search.
Surveillance technologies that promise to prevent gun violence are unproven and threaten our privacy.
We’re celebrating a Mississippi mosque’s groundbreaking ceremony after a court victory, but more work remains.
Unclear regulation and a lack of transparency increase the risk that AI and algorithmic tools that exacerbate racial biases will be used in medical settings.
Electronic monitoring typically uses GPS tracking systems in devices referred to as ankle bracelets, ankle shackles, or tethers to record the location of their wearers. This includes people awaiting trial, serving probation and parole, and facing immigration proceedings.
Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.