Cubanos Pa’lante v. Florida House of Representatives

  • Latest Update: Jan 09, 2026
Placeholder image

This case challenges one congressional district and seven State House districts in South Florida as racially gerrymandered in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Legislature drew these districts along racial lines to form non-compact shapes, connect disparate neighborhoods, and divide established communities. In doing so, lawmakers ignored the nuanced, multifaceted, and diverse nature of the region’s Hispanic and Latino community, treating Hispanic voters as a monolithic group based on false and stereotypic assumptions, which dilutes their influence. The use of race to draw these districts was not justified by the Voting Rights Act or the minority-protection provisions of Florida's Fair Districts Amendments. We filed our complaint in May 2024, and the court denied the government’s motions to dismiss with respect to these eight districts in February 2025. In November 2025, the court granted partial summary judgment for the Florida House on our claims against four of the House districts.

WHAT'S AT STAKE

Fairer representation in the Florida House of Representatives and Congress for communities in South Florida.

The Latest: A trial is scheduled to begin January 12, 2026.

Why Access to Voting is Key to Systemic Equality

Here’s how systemic barriers and discrimination continue to impact access to voting today, and why we’re fighting to ensure all people have equal access to voting.

A profile view of a woman in a voting booth.

The Supreme Court Must Find South Carolina’s Voting Map Unconstitutional

Here’s what you need to know about the crucial redistricting case before our highest court.

Placeholder image

The Supreme Court Cases to Watch

This term, the court will issue decisions impacting immigration, free speech, religious liberty, LGBTQ rights and voting rights.

Placeholder image

Rights Behind the Headlines: Gov. DeSantis’ Culture War on Black Floridians

We’re addressing the impacts of Gov. DeSantis’ assaults on the voting rights of Black Floridians during his term as Florida’s governor.

By Joey Francilus

Placeholder image

Explaining Moore v. Harper, the Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Democracy

North Carolina legislators are asking the court to grant them unfettered power to set rules for voting and elections, without state constitutional limits.

Placeholder image

Related News & Podcasts

News & Commentary
Oct 06, 2023
A profile view of a woman in a voting booth.
  • Voting Rights

Why Access to Voting is Key to Systemic Equality

Here’s how systemic barriers and discrimination continue to impact access to voting today, and why we’re fighting to ensure all people have equal access to voting.
News & Commentary
Oct 10, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

The Supreme Court Must Find South Carolina’s Voting Map Unconstitutional

Here’s what you need to know about the crucial redistricting case before our highest court.
News & Commentary
May 28, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Justice|
  • +4 Issues

The Supreme Court Cases to Watch

This term, the court will issue decisions impacting immigration, free speech, religious liberty, LGBTQ rights and voting rights.
News & Commentary
Jun 29, 2023
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights|
  • +4 Issues

Rights Behind the Headlines: Gov. DeSantis’ Culture War on Black Floridians

We’re addressing the impacts of Gov. DeSantis’ assaults on the voting rights of Black Floridians during his term as Florida’s governor.